3 ms·
Competing is hard and expensive, whereas banning is for sure the faster way to make stock values go up and exec's total package as a result.
by Freedom2 2y ago
Competing is hard and expensive, whereas banning is for sure the faster way to make stock values go up and exec's total package as a result.
- cscurmudgeon 2y agoBanning worked for China all these decades.
- caseyy 2y agoIt’s simply because banning removes a market force in the US that’d drive technological advancement. This is already evident with CNSA/NASA, Huawei/Android, TikTok/Western social media. The Western tech gets mothballed because we stick our heads in the sand and pretend we are undisputed leaders of the world in tech, whereas it is slowly becoming disputable.
- cscurmudgeon 2y agoThe US won't ban DeepSeek from US, but more likely we will ban DeepSeek (and other Chinese companies) from accessing US frontier models. > Western tech gets mothballed because we stick our heads in the sand and pretend we are undisputed leaders of the world in tech, whereas it is slowly becoming disputable. I am hearing Chinese tech is now the best and they achieved it with banning things left and right.
- Kj8nM2pL 2y agoThe Chinese companies are almost always at each other's throat instead of colluding with each other. It's all about competition.