3 ms·
These questions are often hard to answer for people unfamiliar with how VC works, but mostly because VC is not intuitive from a 'normal business' perspective.
by joshdavham 2y ago
These questions are often hard to answer for people unfamiliar with how VC works, but mostly because VC is not intuitive from a 'normal business' perspective.
Essentially, VC's know very that what they're funding is risky and may go completely caput. However the VC model explicitly aims to fund companies that have the potential of becoming huge and becoming very profitable.
Both the founders and VC's behind Astral are not stupid, they know that it could fail or only have moderate success... However, if they succeed in building the next generation go-to ecosystem for python development (which is arguably the world's most popular programming language), we could imagine a future where they spin off some product and it does incredibly well!
- robertlagrant 2y agoIt's not that that future's unimaginable. It's more that it would be nice to have an easy path to knowing how these tools will be funded. They will suck time and effort out of the ecosystem of Python tools, which is fine, except it's not fine if they vanish or decay in X years' time because of funding issues. I don't know the solution, and I really think these tools look about as great as tools can look, so I'm very keen to use them. I would just like some way to know that they'll be supported for 10 years at least.