3 ms·
> even if your body has had more than enough food to sustain itself for a whole week. For reference, that amount of food is zero. You're already set for the we
by thaumasiotes 2y ago
> even if your body has had more than enough food to sustain itself for a whole week.
For reference, that amount of food is zero. You're already set for the week.
Animals don't operate like cars where they're constantly on the verge of death.
- Funes- 2y agoTo sustain itself... at the same rate it usually does (body fat, muscle...). My comment was extremely easy to grasp. Instead, you twisted what I wrote, clinging to a stupidly literal interpretation of it, and came up with a ridiculous reply, riddled with straw man fallacies. Good job (making a fool out of yourself while trying to one up a stranger on the Internet).
- thaumasiotes 2y agoThink a little further, and you might see that the amount you've recently eaten has very little relevance to how much you need to eat in the near future.
- Funes- 2y agoYou didn't get my comment it at first--it's fine, dude. Every other user understood it right away, so no problem.
- thaumasiotes 2y agoWhat do you see as the significance of the qualifier "even if your body has had more than enough food to sustain itself for a whole week"?