> No one knows definitively what AGI actually is The current "leaders" in this field are defining it to be whatever they think they can achieve by adding compu

> No one knows definitively what AGI actually is The current "leaders" in this field are defining it to be whatever they think they can achieve by adding compute. I know I have "general intelligence", but can I prove it to you (or anyone else)? Not really, but in my solipsistic world, I don't have to. Maybe we should set some definitions before trying to "get there" when we don't where "there" is.