4 ms·
Really, who cares? OpenAI has made the argument in the past that it couldn't exist without utilizing copyrighted works without permission and, as a net good fo
by mbStavola 2y ago
Really, who cares?
OpenAI has made the argument in the past that it couldn't exist without utilizing copyrighted works without permission and, as a net good for humanity, they should get a pass. Old dusty laws and authors rights should clearly take a backseat to innovation!
... except now the shoe is on the other foot where suddenly it's bad to use things without permission. If you were a proponent of AI and AI accelerationism then this should still be kosher since the "net good" has increased with a completely open source model that is apparently considerably more efficient.
The only remaining line of defense amounts to censorship concerns and/or "China bad," as if OpenAI also doesn't do the same and the US was a geopolitical darling.
- stuaxo 2y agoIf DeepSeek were petty they would use quotes from OpenAI as their justification.
- robertlagrant 2y agoThey should train an LLM on their justifications and answer via a chatbot.
- dutchbookmaker 2y agoWe are in a state of denial. If AI is the new electricity this idea the US is going to monopolize electricity is just dumb. David Sacks I am sure has many bad bets right now so has to talk his book.
- addicted 2y agoIt’s even worse because OpenAI took all that information and put it behind a paywall they want to make tons of money with. DeepSeek open sourced it so all of humanity can actually benefit from it.