2 ms·
It's a feature of Capitalism. "Waste" that is trimmed one year becomes the new bar "This can run at X". Allocating additional resources requires far higher pu
by mjevans 2y ago
It's a feature of Capitalism.
"Waste" that is trimmed one year becomes the new bar "This can run at X".
Allocating additional resources requires far higher push than taking back something not spent.
Yet some years require more resources. What if there are more natural disasters? What if there's an economic downturn and more people need help? What if companies fail and expected taxes are not paid?
What if it's time to replace durable goods that have reached the end of their projected or useful life? (E.G. Some disgruntled person came to court with a shotgun and fired at all the computers; and oh BTW they're both broke and in jail so there's no cash to be had.)
You can see the very reluctance and assumptions in other posts in reply. They assume there are no audits, no oversight in the system. That the cursory pointer towards a larger process was the ENTIRE process which they then attack.