3 ms·
These discussions never seem to answer important questions. If we never question taxation. And never question spending. Where do we end-up? It is sustainable
by robomartin 2y ago
These discussions never seem to answer important questions.
If we never question taxation. And never question spending. Where do we end-up?
It is sustainable?
Why is it that we can never question either one of these things?
Are these things like fundamental laws of gravity?
Are politicians never to be questioned for their spending or desire to tax us more?
Or how they use our money?
Is it wrong to periodically evaluate the results obtained by every dollar spent?
If so, why?
Does that mean we should allow politicians and agencies to spend as they wish and without supervision or accountability?
Is there ever a good time for oversight?
Etc.
Today it was revealed that we were sending USD $50 million to Gaza for condoms. What? This is insane. And, I suspect, likely the tip of the iceberg.
C'mon folks. Questioning how our money is spent and how much money is taken from us by government is what we should be doing all the time. It should not be the exception. Without accountability, politicians (from all political angles) will take and spend as much as they are able to.
I have this hypothesis: If the government did not take taxes out of your paycheck every week and people had to write them a check every month, there would be riots in every city of this nation. People are blind to taxation and the related spending because they never see that money, it's magic money. You don't feel the pain. If you did, you'd be up in arms when you learn that $50MM of your dollars are going towards buying condoms on the other side of the planet.
And, BTW, those condoms are likely made in China. If they are needed, why doesn't China donate the condoms? Why do US taxpayers have to foot the bill and likely support a healthy profit margin in the process?
We are not going to end-up in a good place if we do not clean-up our attic and bring the house to order. I trust Elon/DOGE and, by extension, the current administration, to do just this. Enough is enough.
Put a different way: We DESPERATELY need to invest this money on internal growth, education, security, health, etc. We need housing, better health outcomes, much better education and myriad other things. Money is not unlimited. Instead of spending $50MM for condoms in Gaza, we should put that money to work where it will do the most good at home.
In order to know where and how much we are wasting, we need to put a microscope on everything and, perhaps, put a number of things on hold while we sort things out. It's a necessary part of the process.
- rexpop 2y ago> we were sending USD $50 million to Gaza for condoms. This is a patently obvious and gross mischaracterization. The US has been providing a broad spectrum of humanitarian assistance addressing urgent needs such as emergency medical aid, food, water. Whether or not you agree with that, you undermine our chances at constructive discourse when you exaggerate or otherwise decontextualize a situation. It's also absurdly disingenuous to claim that "we never question taxation. And never question spending." Of course these concerns are the subject of continuous debate by much more serious people than yourself. Again, whether or not you agree with the outcome, the assertion that "we never question taxation" is utterly, and completely divorced from reality.
- zo1 2y ago> > we were sending USD $50 million to Gaza for condoms. > This is a patently obvious and gross mischaracterization. Looks like it hasn't been confirmed yet, but let's not pretend like there aren't really odd and weird and arguably wasteful items in the US spending bills that serve no immediate purpose for US citizens. Rand Paul releases a yearly report of some of the most prominent ones that he uncovers. I assume they're all hidden in thousand-page spending bills that make it through. These are the results of people that are really un-serious and I wouldn't trust them with our money, they're just drunk on the numbers. To them, a million here a million there is peanuts and essentially bargaining chips in the little games they play in senate/congress. https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/media/reps/dr-paul-releases-2024-festivus-report-on-government-waste/ https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/media/reps/dr-paul-releases-202... I'm busy reading the report now, but the summary notes: "$4.8 million on Ukrainian influencers, $32,596 on breakdancing, $2.1 million for Paraguayan Border Security, $3 Million for ‘Girl-Centered Climate Action’ in Brazil, and much more!"
- viraptor 2y ago> $32,596 on breakdancing Without context, this is meaningless. This may be wasteful, or may create a community space where needed, or sponsor an Olympic team, or... There's many ways that 32k may be an easy investment for a much bigger return.
- 2y ago