4 ms·
>you should also make a rule saying astrology books aren't a legitimate source of sentence guidance My example was absurd on purpose, I didn't want to bring an
by nzach 2y ago
>you should also make a rule saying astrology books aren't a legitimate source of sentence guidance
My example was absurd on purpose, I didn't want to bring an example where people could respond with "well, actually..."
But in the real world that is rarely the case, imagine substituting "astrology book" for "Bible/Quran/..." Would that be considered a legitimate source of sentence guidance? I'm sure people would spend years arguing about that...
As a society we need to understand that LLM hallucination is no different than a bloom filter giving you a false-positive.
- aeturnum 2y agoThen I guess I don't understand the point you are trying to make. Are you saying that the problem is unsolvable and people should just accept that?
- nzach 2y agoMy point is that LMM is a tool, and we should never attribute any sort of blame to our tools. The blame should always be with the humans.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- Retric 2y agoIt’s fine to blame a car’s heater when the design is so poor it can’t keep the cabin warm when it’s only 0C outside. Thus being a spectacularly bad tool is itself a cause to assign blame.