5 ms·
Sounds like a desperate move, now that the insane valuations, GPU capacity projections, and subscription revenue are at risk.
by mv4 2y ago
Sounds like a desperate move, now that the insane valuations, GPU capacity projections, and subscription revenue are at risk.
- mk89 2y agoI doubt this was done in 1 week. Obviously this product had to be released. It takes a lot of design to build stuff for Government, lot of bureaucracy etc.
- criddell 2y agoTrue, but it certainly lands differently today than it would have a week ago.
- mk89 2y agoTo be honest, no. This is the natural evolution of a project that needs a huge amount of data and so on. For me it's more suspicious the "project Stargate" than this one feature.
- shafyy 2y agoHow do you know that they have actually build a product? They probably just wrote the blog post for now.
- captainbland 2y agoProbably trying to say to investors, "the government will never use DeepSeek, our moat is being a trusted US AI company who is trusted for government work" Whether it sticks or not is another matter.
- 999900000999 2y agoNo reason to not trust deepseek, once you run it locally. You can't use it for DoD purposes through...
- jgalt212 2y agoIt's worked for Palantir.
- hfgjbcgjbvg 2y agoFor some short term definition of “worked”
- hulitu 2y agoSeeing two times "trusted", makes me suspicious.
- grajaganDev 2y agoDeepSeek would need FEDRAMP certification to be deployed in most cases.
- miohtama 2y agoThis is also why Altman was lobbying for AI regulation: to have moat with barriers of entry
- mv4 2y agoI am surprised Elon hasn't public said anything about this with all the recent events.