Which is kind of fair enough, isn't it? AI models are right more often than they're wrong, but they're not nearly infallible enough to be used in a court. So th

Which is kind of fair enough, isn't it? AI models are right more often than they're wrong, but they're not nearly infallible enough to be used in a court. So the output of them should be treated like an intelligence tip, i.e. a fact that probably points you in the right direction for gathering more solid evidence... but has a chance of pointing you in the wrong direction entirely. Which is exactly how most of us use LLMs right now.