3 ms·
Exactly. The whole goal is to remove the "skill premium" from the labor markets, as far as I can tell. So I would argue that this whole thing is a net negative
by entropi 2y ago
Exactly. The whole goal is to remove the "skill premium" from the labor markets, as far as I can tell.
So I would argue that this whole thing is a net negative. We are spending tons of energy for net negative gains.
- visarga 2y agoMaybe it's a negative for you if you already have marketable skills, but a positive for others who want to get in.
- strogonoff 2y ago> Maybe it's a negative for you if you already have marketable skills, but a positive for others who want to get in. I am not fully clear, to get in on what? The skill that is valued less and less? Or on being an LLM prompter? How much would a rational management be willing to pay a prompt writer (assuming they cannot automate that as well in the first place)?
- entropi 2y agoYeah but if there is no requirement/barrier of entry to do a job; it becomes, pretty much by definition, a minimum wage job. Is this the great future the AI promises? Almost everyone working for minimum wage while a few tech oligarch rules over all?