4 ms·

It sounds like if they owe you the training architecture and training data set.

• chris_pie 2y ago
  It absolutely doesn't. It sounds like further diluting the term "open-source" isn't great.
  • cubefox 2y ago
    I assume when people say "open source model" they mean "open weights model". The "open source" term doesn't really make sense here, since machine learning models are not compilations of source code. (Though DeepSeek has published several papers with details on their training process. It's more than just open weights.)
    • chris_pie 2y ago
      ML models do have a "source" though
      • cubefox 2y ago
        If ML models have a source, brains have a source. Brains don't have a source. Therefore, ML models don't have a source.