4 ms·
Would be great if the next generation of base models was designed to be inferred with 128GB of VRAM while 8bit quantized (which would fit in the consumer hardwa
by tarruda 2y ago
Would be great if the next generation of base models was designed to be inferred with 128GB of VRAM while 8bit quantized (which would fit in the consumer hardware class).
For example, I imagine a strong MoE base with 16 billion active parameters and 6 or 7 experts would keep a good performance while being possible to run on 128GB RAM macbooks.
- Davidzheng 2y agoWould be great, but unfortunately i think intelligence at that compute scale will be limit by hardware not its model. Though at hardware limit I would expect it to be roughly human level especially if optimized for a particular domain.
- tarruda 2y agoI remember that Llama 3 was trained on data curated by Llama 2 and it resulted in a model with a significant performance boost (even though it was trained by a previous generation model of the same size). Maybe using a strong reasoning model such as R1 the next generation, even more performance can be extracted from smaller models.
- danielbln 2y agoThat's already happening, and is in fact even part of the R1 training pipeline. An intermediate small reasoning model churns out training data for RL a larger model, rinse and repeat. Deepseek also showed model distillation with synthetic reasoning data to work quite well.
- alchemist1e9 2y agoIt’s a pretty neat paradigm and I see an abstract connection to how brains dream and produce their own synthetic training data while sleeping that supplements their real data used while awake.
- Davidzheng 2y agoIs your first claim in the R1 paper? I didn't see it when I looked
- danielhanchen 2y agoSo I remember Deepseek used float8 for training - Character AI also used int8 for training - it is indeed possible, but sometimes training can be unstable - Deepseek to my knowledge is actually the first lab to use float8 at a large scale without causing loss spikes - they used FP8 tensor cores, then every 4th matrix multiply, they accumulated to a FP32 accumulator - it seems like the Hopper Tensor Cores accumulation mechanism might not be actual FP32 accumulation. I wrote more here: https://x.com/danielhanchen/status/1872719599029850391 https://x.com/danielhanchen/status/1872719599029850391