4 ms·
"Linux ultimately prevailed-not because it was better from the start, but because it allowed developers to modify the code freely, run it more securely and affo
by openrisk 2y ago
"Linux ultimately prevailed-not because it was better from the start, but because it allowed developers to modify the code freely, run it more securely and affordably, and build a broader ecosystem that enabled more capabilities than any closed system"
Deepseek followed llama and will be followed by others in the usual mushroom fashion of open source. People really dont appreciate the magnitude of the disruptive force that is unleashed by the open source paradigm. In a year from now the landscape will be brimming with new initiatives. In a few years nobody will even remember "open"ai.
Conventional economic theory will always misread the future of computing (and thus "AI"). The zero marginal cost and infinite replicability is not a bug, its a feature. But so far we dont really have a good model how to think about it and merge it with mainstream business models. Something must pay the bills eventually but these are very different bills from those of conventional scarcity based businesses. Ironically in the end the main scarcity is human ingenuity. Read the interview of the Deepseek founder on why their models are open source.
- hx8 2y agoWith current generation AI we really need AI + Humans to have good results. It seems likely that the entire LLM branch of products will have this limitation. If that's the case let's race to make the best open source AI as fast as possible, so it can be spread as wide as possible and can be used to fix our shared problems. It's the spreading widely that will lead to breakout results in fields such a cancer research just as much as having the most intelligent system, because humans bring some X factor for creativity/ingenuity/novelty.