4 ms·
I think it's entirely possible that one categorically can't think correctly about markets and equity valuations since they are vibes-based. Post hoc, sure, but
by flashman 2y ago
I think it's entirely possible that one categorically can't think correctly about markets and equity valuations since they are vibes-based. Post hoc, sure, but not ahead of time.
- Rury 2y agoMost people don't care about the fundamentals of equity valuations is the crux of it. If they can make money via derivatives, who cares about the underlying valuations? I mean just look at GME for one example, it's been mostly a squeeze driven play between speculators. And then you have the massive dispersion trade that's been happening on the SP500 over the last year+. And when most people invest in index funds, and index funds are weighted mostly by market cap, value investing has been essentially dead for a while now.
- flashman 2y agoYeah, GME for instance shows you can only think about it correctly in retrospect (or perhaps with perfect knowledge of all players' intentions).
- suraci 2y agothe only correcr answer... current market is a 100x GME it's a game, deepseek is just an random event, which may or may not change the storyline not a single big AI company gain any profit from AI, but it doesn't prevent lines going up in fact, the price is only about how much companys spent but not about how much companys gained current buyers are not buying the AI vision talked here, they're buying the price, and will sell the price so if the lines keep going up, no bother, everyone are happy to let their money sit in hands of hedge funds or etfs