3 ms·
Totally preposterous. If this doesn't fail the obviousness test for the uspto, I don't know what does.
by VSerge 14y ago
Totally preposterous. If this doesn't fail the obviousness test for the uspto, I don't know what does.
- fpgeek 14y agoWell, under re-examination the sealed, crustless sandwich patent eventually fell, so there's that.
- Natsu 14y ago> If this doesn't fail the obviousness test for the uspto, I don't know what does. We're talking about the same USPTO that issued this patent: http://www.google.com/patents/US6360693 http://www.google.com/patents/US6360693 It only took four years for the USPTO to figure out that there were already other patents like that: http://www.google.com/patents/US4557219 http://www.google.com/patents/US4557219 http://www.google.com/patents/US428220 http://www.google.com/patents/US428220