I think this is a very poor decision. It reeks of cost-cutting, and whilst comment on the commentariat is an understood approach, machine integrated takes on th

I think this is a very poor decision. It reeks of cost-cutting, and whilst comment on the commentariat is an understood approach, machine integrated takes on the competition seems to me like a very poor way to do things. I can't see this increasing goodwill amongst original sources, or the readership. "hmm I thought I read this already" is very risky. Whats the NEW take in this write up matters to me. Also the component of confirmation bias which will emerge.