3 ms·
Interesting ideas but imho overly simplistic. You could be personally endurist (ie determined to tough it out in your own life, for a variety of possible reason
by anigbrowl 2y ago
Interesting ideas but imho overly simplistic. You could be personally endurist (ie determined to tough it out in your own life, for a variety of possible reasons) but still wholly accepting of other people not being so, and presumably vice versa.
Religions are overwhelmingly Endurist. Christianity deems life sacred and views suffering as potentially redemptive. Islam treats life as a divine test with eternal consequences. No major religion suggests that ending existence might be preferable to extreme suffering, or questions the value of bringing new life into difficult conditions.
I can't understand this contention, given that the blog logo uses Buddhist iconography and Buddhism is rooted in the notion of transcending suffering, not least by acceptance of death. Perhaps the author meant to say 'no major religion in the west'.
- QualiaAdvocate 2y ago(I'm the Author) I would say that Buddhism is spiritually Serenist but practically Endurist. The reason for this, I believe, is due to the competitive advantages Endurism has—all memeplexes that didn't adopt it disappeared. The founders of Buddhism were sophisticated enough to adopt endurism on a practical level, which allowed it to survive. The idea of reincarnation does a lot of heavy lifting in this context by making suicide a pointless move to escape suffering.