> grown by "alpha" leaders and staff. Umm... isn't the whole point of an "alpha" to be the top-man... so how would there be more than one? That doesn't make an

> grown by "alpha" leaders and staff. Umm... isn't the whole point of an "alpha" to be the top-man... so how would there be more than one? That doesn't make any internally logical sense. > An individual will likely be more productive in the environment best suited for them Good premise, but you don't need the "alpha" theory to argue it. > in determining if the "alpha" concept is a "more successful" model in business. You do a really poor job of explaining what this even means, but it sounds bogus from your description. No offense intended.