4 ms·
I think you will need to provide more details for this to be taken seriously.
by grajaganDev 2y ago
I think you will need to provide more details for this to be taken seriously.
- vitalipom 2y agoYou’re right! Editing.
- mtmail 2y agoThe previous post has some details https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42773667 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42773667 I'm not sure they grasps all the existing browser and DNS security models, but it seems to be about phishing.
- vitalipom 2y agoI TL;DR-ed it here in the edits of the root post above.
- elmerfud 2y agoSo it's a man in the middle proxy situation? The problem is proxies could do this all along and many corporate proxies do this all the time but they also keep the URL the same and you just don't know it because it's transparently happening on the network. Is this any worse than any other phishing attack? Not the way I look at it and it doesn't appear particularly novel either.