3 ms·
that didn't exist in 2017 when we did these scans - all the negative scanners were approaching $5000 or more, and were very fiddly and manual. However they did
by genewitch 2y ago
that didn't exist in 2017 when we did these scans - all the negative scanners were approaching $5000 or more, and were very fiddly and manual. However they did give great output. The epson print scanner did great, though, and there was no fiddling. Put prints in the top, push a button, collect prints from the bottom 15 seconds later, type a folder/collection name, repeat the process.
good to see there's a competitive negative scanner in the sphere, now!