8 ms·
> But the cons were substantial: ... > This wouldn’t retroactively apply to existing packages. Why is this substantial? My understanding is that packages shoul
by imoverclocked 2y ago
> But the cons were substantial:
...
> This wouldn’t retroactively apply to existing packages.
Why is this substantial? My understanding is that packages shouldn't be touched once published. It seems likely for any change to not apply retroactively.