>But a human isn't intelligent over a second, and synapses do form over longer periods which is what it takes for humans to solve harder problems. So you’re sa

>But a human isn't intelligent over a second, and synapses do form over longer periods which is what it takes for humans to solve harder problems. So you’re saying as you talk to me right now you’re not conscious? Neurons didn’t grow connections right now so you’re not alive? You won’t form connections in an hour so during that hour your some kind of robot and suddenly when you form a connection you’re not? We have algorithms that can self evolve neural networks in computers on its own. So you’re actually wrong here there’s progress on this front. I am not missing anything critical. I know there are huge differences between the human brain and an LLM but the statement remains true. Both are neural networks. The problem here is that you either don’t understand vocabulary or you think everyone around you is so dumb they can’t see the differences. Everyone and I mean everyone knows what you’re saying in the paragraph above. It’s common knowledge anyone can pull out their ass and your regurgitating it as if your a scientist or expert. Get this, BOTH are still neural networks and both have commonalities despite the distinctions. Both are also Turing complete.