3 ms·

If you watch this video, it explains well what the major difference is between DeepSeek and existing LLMs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCqqCLlsIBU https://w

If you watch this video, it explains well what the major difference is between DeepSeek and existing LLMs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCqqCLlsIBU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCqqCLlsIBU It seems like there is MUCH to gain by migrating to this approach - and it theoretically should not cost more to switch to that approach than vs the rewards to reap. I expect all the major players are already working full-steam to incorporate this into their stacks as quickly as possible. IMO, this seems incredibly bad to Nvidia, and incredibly good to everyone else. I don't think this seems particularly bad for ChatGPT. They've built a strong brand. This should just help them reduce - by far - one of their largest expenses. They'll have a slight disadvantage to say Google - who can much more easily switch from GPU to CPU. ChatGPT could have some growing pains there. Google would not.

wolfhumble 2y ago
> I don't think this seems particularly bad for ChatGPT. They've built a strong brand. This should just help them reduce - by far - one of their largest expenses. Often expenses like that are keeping your competitors away.
- onlyrealcuzzo 2y ago
  Yes, but it typically doesn't matter if someone can reach parity or even surpass you - they have to surpass you by a step function to take a significant number of your users. This is a step function in terms of efficiency (which presumably will be incorporated into ChatGPT within months), but not in terms of end user experience. It's only slightly better there.
  - ReptileMan 2y ago
    One data point but my subscription for chatgpt is cancelled every time. So I made every month decision to resub. And because the cost of switching is essentially zero - the moment a better service is up there I will switch in an instant.
    - onlyrealcuzzo 2y ago
      There are obviously people like you, but I hope you realize this is not the typical user.
tomrod 2y ago
That is a fantastic video, BTW.

wolfhumble 2y ago

> I don't think this seems particularly bad for ChatGPT. They've built a strong brand. This should just help them reduce - by far - one of their largest expenses. Often expenses like that are keeping your competitors away.

onlyrealcuzzo 2y ago
Yes, but it typically doesn't matter if someone can reach parity or even surpass you - they have to surpass you by a step function to take a significant number of your users. This is a step function in terms of efficiency (which presumably will be incorporated into ChatGPT within months), but not in terms of end user experience. It's only slightly better there.
- ReptileMan 2y ago
  One data point but my subscription for chatgpt is cancelled every time. So I made every month decision to resub. And because the cost of switching is essentially zero - the moment a better service is up there I will switch in an instant.
  - onlyrealcuzzo 2y ago
    There are obviously people like you, but I hope you realize this is not the typical user.

tomrod 2y ago

That is a fantastic video, BTW.