4 ms·
The equating of writing slower code to "sloppy programming" seems like sloppy reasoning to me. If it was sloppy to knowingly go with a slower solution, then usi
by nessus42 14y ago
The equating of writing slower code to "sloppy programming" seems like sloppy reasoning to me. If it was sloppy to knowingly go with a slower solution, then using Python, for instance, or any scripting language for that matter, would always be "sloppy".
It isn't.
For me, Scala provides a happy middle ground between a scripting language like Python, and an "enterprise" language like Java. Scala is as nearly performant as Java--and sometimes it performs significantly better than Java due to having parallel collections, and the like--while having nearly the expressiveness of a scripting language like Python.
Also, Scala's performance issues are overblown. I program in Scala professionally every day and it performs great.