3 ms·
I'd be surprised if Instagram was paying that much. I've known at least one person sharing video at 1 million uniques per day and his cost was a fraction of 200
by mbenjaminsmith 14y ago
I'd be surprised if Instagram was paying that much. I've known at least one person sharing video at 1 million uniques per day and his cost was a fraction of 200k (though I don't remember how much exactly).
The chances of you going outside your 1k budget before you can take on investment or earn some revenue are basically zero.
- stewie2 14y agoAmazon charges $0.1 for 1GB storage. suppose one active user uploads 5 pictures each day on average and each picture takes up 1mb. If you have 500k active users, they can use up 500k x 5mb = 2500GB = $250. $250 x 30 = $7500 because this cost is accumulative, within a year, the monthly bill will be as high as $75000. This is just the data storage. There are extra fees for database access, bandwidth ...
- mbenjaminsmith 14y ago"The photos themselves go straight to Amazon S3, which currently stores several terabytes of photo data for us." http://instagram-engineering.tumblr.com/post/13649370142/what-powers-instagram-hundreds-of-instances-dozens-of http://instagram-engineering.tumblr.com/post/13649370142/wha... That was 7 months ago, so let's say 5TB today. Plugging that into the calculator for AWS says Instagram pays a whopping $500 for photo storage each month. I don't want to take the time to do it myself but here http://highscalability.com/blog/2012/4/9/the-instagram-architecture-facebook-bought-for-a-cool-billio.html http://highscalability.com/blog/2012/4/9/the-instagram-archi... someone punches (in the comments) all of their numbers into the AWS calculator. He comes up with 12k per month based on what they've said they're running.
- statictype 14y agoYes, this is true if each user uploads 5 photos every day. In reality, 90% of the users may upload a single photo every week.