> doesn't seem invalidate that more compute wouldn't translate to even _higher_ capabilities? That's how i understand it. And since their current goal seems t

> doesn't seem invalidate that more compute wouldn't translate to even _higher_ capabilities? That's how i understand it. And since their current goal seems to be 'AGI' and their current plan for achieving it seems to be scaling LLMs (network depth wise and at inference time prompt wise), i don't see why it wouldn't hold.