4 ms·
Is this just a case where they can string along and claim lack of proof or do they claim it was just an accident etc? Which government is failing to uphold the
by ddtaylor 2y ago
Is this just a case where they can string along and claim lack of proof or do they claim it was just an accident etc?
Which government is failing to uphold their property rights basically?
- lupusreal 2y agoThe ships owner / crew will of course claim it was an accident, but Sweden is investigating it as a crime. That investigation hasn't run its course yet.
- SideburnsOfDoom 2y agoIt could be both? If I am driving my car, and I hit a person due to not paying attention, isn't that both an accident and a crime. I am not saying that it is an accident; personally I very much doubt it. But they're not exclusive. You don't have to rule out "accident" before you investigate "crime".
- lupusreal 2y agoThis is the fourth incident in a short period of time, so it being a deliberate act of sabotage is very likely. However it may have been done by a small number of crew, maybe just one guy, paid to do it while the rest were oblivious.
- SideburnsOfDoom 2y ago> so it being a deliberate act of sabotage is very likely. I agree, that's why I very much doubt that they're really accidents. Isn't the captain responsible for the ship regardless of what they intended or what they personally knew?
- lupusreal 2y agoMore or less, yeah. The ship itself could be forfeit even though the owners probably knew nothing of this.