3 ms·
Respectfully, I don't understand what your problem is. First, you don't have to debug any code. That's your personal choice. Second, whether LLM are used or not
by csomar 2y ago
Respectfully, I don't understand what your problem is. First, you don't have to debug any code. That's your personal choice. Second, whether LLM are used or not is irrelevant. The original developer is the party that decides to check and double-check his work and whether he extensively verified what the code is doing (and maybe tightly tested it). LLMs are not making this worse or better.
- kuschku 2y agoFirst: > First, you don't have to debug any code. That's your personal choice. To quote the Simpsons: > Money can be exchanged for goods and services Second: > LLMs are not making this worse or better. The bottleneck is never "writing code", it's "thinking". LLMs can solve one, but not the other. They allow you to produce more thought (and give you false confidence), but the code has less thought put into it, making it worse.