3 ms·
> Certainly value to be had here I don't agree. You won't cite an LLM in an academic paper as a source (since it's unverifiable and not reproducible), and clai
by otabdeveloper4 2y ago
> Certainly value to be had here
I don't agree. You won't cite an LLM in an academic paper as a source (since it's unverifiable and not reproducible), and claiming than an LLM's result is your own original would be fraud. So unless you never plan on publishing anything ever, what's the point?