> No, because with hydrogen we don't have working prototypes nor a track record improvement. This feels like a chicken and egg situation. There isn’t sufficien

> No, because with hydrogen we don't have working prototypes nor a track record improvement. This feels like a chicken and egg situation. There isn’t sufficient research or funding yet to write off hydrogen. If there were similar amounts of money spent in hydrogen compared to batteries, we could have a better sense of what’s possible and make a choice towards one or the other. But today, this comes off to me like saying nothing better is possible than what we already know, which to me feels unimaginative.