4 ms·

> despite a past conviction What conviction?

• Bengalilol 2y ago
  You are right. That's my opinion, which is of no interest at all and factually there was not any conviction. Let me rephrase : The Streisand effect in full force. Hiring a competent and transparent person—someone who shows remorse, regret, and explains how they’ve grown from a difficult situation—isn’t necessarily the real issue. But hiring someone who shifts the blame onto others for making past incidents public? That’s an entirely different problem.