4 ms·

Why would shareholders have a problem with it? People with big money currently value AI bullshit more than recognizable branding.

• mrweasel 2y ago
  Because Microsoft just pissed away their biggest brand after Windows and maybe Microsoft. Brand recognition holds value, a lot of value. Imagine Pepsi deciding that they are done with Pepsi Max, arguably their biggest brand, after Pepsi itself, and decides that it's now Pepsi Cake. Just kill of all references to their biggest brand. That wouldn't go down well and Microsoft is only getting away with it because pretty much everyone who needs it already have their subscription.
  • TheRealSteel 2y ago
    Yep. They obviously learned nothing from killing Xbox overnight. As an IT person I can guarantee this rebranding is going to cause confusion that will waste my time. That being said, Coke killed Coke Zero and seems to be doing okay I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    • t-writescode 2y ago
      Coke Zero still exists? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola_Zero_Sugar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola_Zero_Sugar
      • deleted 2y ago
        [deleted]
      • KeplerBoy 2y ago
        it's now coca cola zero sugar.
        • t-writescode 2y ago
          Literally everyone I know calls it "Coke Zero" - in fact, the "Zero" pattern has spread to the various soda companies to reflect the particular style of zero sugar.
          • KeplerBoy 2y ago
            Sure, that's why it was a weird rebranding.
            • pas 2y ago
              They probably felt that it stopped being cool, it's now just a common name, so they went ahead and made it into something more legible.
        • vel0city 2y ago
          I only just now noticed it changed in the US, which apparently happened in 2022. I remember seeing "Coca-Cola sin azúcar" and "Coca-Cola sans sucre" in foreign markets before, I feel like I saw that pre-2022. I don't recall ever seeing a "Coca-Cola cero", for instance. Kind of feels like it was more aligning the brands internationally but maybe I'm just misremembering.
  • pjc50 2y ago
    Imagine killing the globally recognized Twitter brand for a single generic letter. The common denominator is ego. Office may be a globally recognized brand, but it was defined by someone else, and the person making the decision needs to mark their territory.
    • autoexec 2y ago
      That's okay because everyone just calls it twitter anyway. there will be kids on twitter, calling it twitter, who were never alive when it was still named twitter
• PKop 2y ago
  I'm a shareholder and I have a problem with it. It's a bad focus and product strategy over-dosing on AI hype which I think will hurt them in the future.
• rsynnott 2y ago
  I mean, long-term shareholders might raise an eyebrow; presumably the bubble will, at some point, burst.