5 ms·
That would be the best case outcome for some, and even that is a horribly bad outcome. But the vast majority of people would get DDOSed, scammed, misled by poli
by computerthings 2y ago
That would be the best case outcome for some, and even that is a horribly bad outcome. But the vast majority of people would get DDOSed, scammed, misled by politicians and political actors etc. The erosion of trust just by humans being intellectually dishonest and tribal is already bearing really dark fruit.. covering the globe in LLM slop on top of that will predictably make it much worse.
- A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 2y agoTo be perfectly honest, that erosion of trust is already here.
- computerthings 2y agoNot that erosion of trust, an erosion of trust. Big difference. But yes, an erosion of trust was already there, just like there was never perfect trust, and like even in the worst hellscape humans can physically maintain "there will always be some trust left, somewhere". All that is true, but also doesn't say much. Erosion of trust is also not something that just happens or "is here now", it's a description of a living process after all, between humans and groups of them, and you can reverse it with honesty. Erosion and regrowing of trust happens all the time, you might say. It takes time, kinda like reversing erosion and planting things takes longer than erosion and cutting them down, but so what.