2 ms·
The question/argument was well defined by parent-grandparent posts: people reason as LLMs, including a suggestion that people discussing here are not being self
by mrbungie 2y ago
The question/argument was well defined by parent-grandparent posts: people reason as LLMs, including a suggestion that people discussing here are not being self-conscious of said similarity (i.e. people parroting/regurgitating). You can check it above.
I won't continue with these discussions as I feel people are being just obtuse about this and it is becoming more emotional than rational.
- ben_w 2y ago> The question/argument was well defined by parent-grandparent posts: people reason as LLMs, including a suggestion that people discussing here are not being self-conscious of said similarity (i.e. people parroting/regurgitating). You can check it above. With a lack of precision necessary when the phrase "You need scientific evidence" is invoked. It's very easy to trip over "common sense" reasoning and definitions — even Newton did so with calculus, and Euclid did so with geometry. > I won't continue with these discussions as I feel people are being just obtuse about this and it is becoming more emotional than rational. As you wish. I am relatively unemotional on this.