3 ms·
Have experiences and feelings. Have personal knowledge of something. Be able to express language with a training/knowledge/etc corpus of far smaller size.
by mjmas 2y ago
Have experiences and feelings. Have personal knowledge of something.
Be able to express language with a training/knowledge/etc corpus of far smaller size.
- error_logic 2y agoA lot of that is provided by multi-modality including feedback from the body and interacting with objects and people with more than just the words. That expands the context of a human's experiences dramatically compared to just reading books. Plus even when humans are reading books a mental image of what's going on in the story is common. Not everyone has that, but it shows how much a basic LLM lacks and multi-modal would add. Now the real question to my mind is whether we can train models with actual empathy to learn from the experiences of other people without having to go through the experience directly. Doing so would put them above many individuals' understanding already. . .
- ben_w 2y agoWhile I agree with: > Be able to express language with a training/knowledge/etc corpus of far smaller size. Nobody knows what it would mean to test for: > Have experiences and feelings. And I am unclear if: > Have personal knowledge of something. Would or would not be met by putting them in charge of a robot of some kind to collect experiences? I'd certainly agree that the default is to make them "book smart" rather than "street smart", but at most that's an "is not" rather than "cannot".