3 ms·
Then it's a stupid way to check for it, because it was possible and trivial enough to implement in a short time frame with a "rewrite" in the middle and no atte
by joseda-hg 2y ago
Then it's a stupid way to check for it, because it was possible and trivial enough to implement in a short time frame with a "rewrite" in the middle and no attempt to meassure pushing back in other ways when the first one failed
- blharr 2y agoYea still absolutely unreasonable, but it's the only way it even makes sense for me