Both papers are linked very clearly in the article, and it was easy to quickly find them just skimming through the article without even reading: > This problem

Both papers are linked very clearly in the article, and it was easy to quickly find them just skimming through the article without even reading: > This problem was introduced in a 1981 paper where "1981 paper" links to https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-10843-2_34 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/3-540-10843-2_34 and in the next paragraph: > Last year, in a study that was presented at the Foundations of Computer Science conference in Chicago, a team of seven researchers where "a study" links to https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00807 https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.00807 Note that both of these are in the introductory section (third and fourth paragraphs), before the article goes into details, history and context. If this is what counts as “Apparently both of them are linked deep inside the article”, then it appears there exist very different ideas of what “deep inside” means.