3 ms·
Deporting violent criminals now constitutes "attacking the blue states?" Most of the specific apprehensions are in so-called "sanctuary cities" the preponderanc
by slowmovintarget 2y ago
Deporting violent criminals now constitutes "attacking the blue states?" Most of the specific apprehensions are in so-called "sanctuary cities" the preponderance of which are located in blue states. That these violent illegal immigrants live in sanctuary cities is not a mystery, that these cities are in blue states is not a mystery. That you believe this is anything other than protecting lawful citizens and the government doing the job it's supposed to is baffling.
Or were you referring to some other action?
- nobodynowhere 2y agoHow did you make the leap to violent criminals? Regardless of our particular opinions on immigration laws and enforcement, conflating illegal immigrants in general with violent criminals doesn’t help.
- bdangubic 2y ago“violent criminals” is fake news he’s selling to the masses. it is how you win elections, scare a bunch of midwesterners who haven’t seen an immigrant violent criminal in their lives that this is core issue plauging america while using 4 years to pilage whatever they can :) not that we haven’t seen this already…
- bdangubic 2y agolots of violent criminals in Chicago schools, daaaamn :) Trump could give two shits about immigrant violent criminals cause even if he magically rounded up every single one of them he might have one Boeing 777 to fill
- Loggias 2y ago[dead]
- mcphage 2y ago> Deporting violent criminals now constitutes "attacking the blue states?" Good question—if he starts doing that I’ll let you know. > Or were you referring to some other action? Well, I certainly wasn’t referring to the imaginary one you’re talking about.
- catlover76 2y ago[dead]