4 ms·
Your bias is showing by giving the DNI the benefit of the doubt; especially considering this occurred after Snowden in the same year.
by gjsman-1000 2y ago
Your bias is showing by giving the DNI the benefit of the doubt; especially considering this occurred after Snowden in the same year.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> Your bias is showing by giving the DNI the benefit of the doubt Your taking the joke seriously is the entire joke. Sort of like people getting into conniptions over the name DOGE. That's the point of naming it DOGE: to prompt that reaction.
- mmooss 2y agoI think that is called, trolling, no?
- JumpCrisscross 2y agoYes. It's an intelligence satellite. Counterintelligence is professional trolling. The IC trolling conspiracy theorists is water-is-wet stuff.
- mmooss 2y ago> Counterintelligence is professional trolling. They always say the next generation, being more 'digitally native', will be amazing with computers. That hasn't been my experience. But if what you say is true, they are going to be great at counterintelligence.
- leptons 2y agoYour bias is showing by blaming this on Obama, when he would not have any input or even knew about that patch being created. He had far more serious things to worry about than creating a patch. I'm not sure why you would think POTUS is even in the loop on creating patches.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> by blaming this on Obama To be fair, they blamed it on the administration. DNI is the administration. But like, if you're DNI, of course you're going to announce a patch like this. I can't imagine being in that role without a part of you enjoying trolling the conspiracy theorists and other humourless types.