Your reading comprehension might be quite bad >Indeed, the one who thinks containers are nothing but Docker. I just cited papers talking about jails, zones an

Your reading comprehension might be quite bad >Indeed, the one who thinks containers are nothing but Docker. I just cited papers talking about jails, zones and chroot.. >to say virtualization is synonymous with containers I said containers are virtualization, not that virtualization is synonymous with containers. That is container ∈ virtualization, not container = virtualization. No offense but that's a highschool level reading comprehension error right there. >Or better yet, the one who cites a PDF from 2000 or an article from 2006, At least I cited stuff. Go ahead and submit something to wikipedia with sources if you think containers are no longer virtualization. Otherwise I'm out.