4 ms·
> with the highest vehicle-to-officer ratio in the bay area There are 30% more violent assaults on BART vs Muni. > if only there were some other way for them
by timewizard 2y ago
> with the highest vehicle-to-officer ratio in the bay area
There are 30% more violent assaults on BART vs Muni.
> if only there were some other way for them to get around!
Do you want them to respond rapidly or eventually?
- NewJazz 2y agoAre you saying that they need vehicles to get to the crime locations faster? Are vehicles really faster than them being at the BART station on foot? If anything that statistic you cited shows that their existing policies are not a deterrent. Perhaps because they are in their vehicles instead of on train cars where the crimes are happening.
- timewizard 2y ago> Are vehicles really faster than them being at the BART station on foot? So you're sure you can create a deployment plan that will have the correct amount of officers on station at all times? What if they need backup? What if two incidents happen at once? > their existing policies are not a deterrent. I'm sure their vehicle strategy has little to do with deterrence. Or are you suggesting this is the _reason_ why there is more crime? > instead of on train cars where the crimes are happening. Crimes also happen on the platform, the turnstiles, and the curtilage. I get that people want to be "mad the vehicles exist" but this is not sensible.