2 ms·
Indeed. People have spent lots of words talking about the how the saturation of generative AI output will spoil future trainig, which is true, but is most imme
by swatcoder 2y ago
Indeed.
People have spent lots of words talking about the how the saturation of generative AI output will spoil future trainig, which is true, but is most immediately a problem for the AI model developers themselves.
But even with them only acting as consumers, they break almost of the economic and social bases for how the internet works.
Advertisers want their ads to be seen by humans, experts/pontificators want their words to to be seen by humans, artists want their images to be seem by humans.
These things provide the foundations of the internet as we know it.
If online tools are being used by bots who are unaffected bu ads, and texts are summarized by bots instead of read directly, and images are synthesized dynamically instead of appreciated directly, the internet itself breaks.
As the author notes, the next most likely equilibrium involves an even more commercial, more expensive, more gated, more impersonal future than we might have already seen ourselves careening towards just a few years ago.
Enjoy what you've had!
- jfengel 2y agoI wonder if the ads affect the bots. How does anyone figure out if something is worthwhile, if they haven't used it? They have heuristics, one of which is comfort and familiarity. That's why advertising exists: to get a brand in front of your face, so you recognize it. Maybe the bots end up with a similar heuristic as they crawl their sources. Perhaps the advertisers will be perfectly happy to pay, not for human eyeballs but for the crawlers. This is, of course, absurd. But since I find the capabilities of the bots opaque, why not absurdity.
- acheron 2y agoWon’t someone shed a tear for the poor advertisers?