> it is much more conductive to writing text editor code than the general purpose Lua. Personally I think that was already the case with "classic" VimScript, a

> it is much more conductive to writing text editor code than the general purpose Lua. Personally I think that was already the case with "classic" VimScript, although I also appreciate it's a bit idiosyncratic and that many people don't have the time or interest to learn it. I suppose that's also the problem with VimScript9. I agree is a real and meaningful improvement over VimScript, but I suppose that for many it's just "not important enough" to learn, even though it's not an especially difficult language to learn. I don't think that's unreasonable – there's tons of not especially difficult things I never bothered to learn in depth either, I just happened to choose Vim stuff at some point.