Thanks for the feedback—it’s a valid point, and I’ve been giving a lot of thought to how teams define and approach 'fixes.' In some cases, a fix might mean some

Thanks for the feedback—it’s a valid point, and I’ve been giving a lot of thought to how teams define and approach 'fixes.' In some cases, a fix might mean something as significant as transitioning away from a public parent Docker image to a 0-CVE solution. That said, this is part of a broader phase-two conversation. Right now, I’m focused on building the foundational layer: keeping things transparent, pulling and sharing public data, and addressing the larger challenges around public Docker image management. Expanding into customer-specific features is definitely on the roadmap, but we’re taking it step by step. I’d love to hear about the challenges you’ve faced managing fixes and dependencies—what would make the biggest difference for your team?