3 ms·
We agree here. The point is to detect imposters via favicon. Case 1 is easy, simple, and a legitimate concern. Case 2 is the inverse of case 1. A host is miscon
by 1970-01-01 2y ago
We agree here. The point is to detect imposters via favicon. Case 1 is easy, simple, and a legitimate concern. Case 2 is the inverse of case 1. A host is misconfigured or something. Much harder to detect, but no more important. Case 3 should not exist.
- toast0 2y ago> Case 3 should not exist. Case 3 must exist by the pigeonhole principle given that the hashes are smaller than most favicons. Otoh, if it does show up, you can exclude it by doing a full comparison.
- HeatrayEnjoyer 2y agoIf it does show up you go play the lottery where the odds are far less long.