> if you assume public services must make money and this is not a universal rule I don't assume that. But I'm not the electorate. > Tons of public services he

> if you assume public services must make money and this is not a universal rule I don't assume that. But I'm not the electorate. > Tons of public services hemorrhage money And that makes them easy targets for cuts. I personally prefer having public services stick around to serve people. That means stiffening them against political attacks as much as possible, and taking easy wins if they're available. > how much do you think a robo one will cost? So now we're arguing the actual cost-benefit of the technology. That's a much better way to approach it than reflexively dismissing it.