Important to note: > Although the survey is not statistically representative of Nature readers or the scientific community at large I found that the survey se

Important to note: > Although the survey is not statistically representative of Nature readers or the scientific community at large I found that the survey seems to have been advertised for with "Has Bluesky replaced X for scientists?" according to this article from Jan 14 [1]. This attracts people who switched more I think. So the 70% figure is nothing than hot air. It is still interesting seeing the positive sentiments and reasons for switching analyzed. [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00037-y https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00037-y