>A law without consequence is just a really nice guideline. Laws are guidelines even with consequences involved; you can't forcefully prevent someone from doin

>A law without consequence is just a really nice guideline. Laws are guidelines even with consequences involved; you can't forcefully prevent someone from doing something with a piece of paper that has some ink on it. The courts might throw out evidence based on an illegal warrant or lack thereof, the officers involved might be punished. But in the moment the officers can collect the "evidence" and no piece of paper can do a single thing about it, especially if consequences are stipulated but they are fine with getting them.