4 ms·
The cost of dealing with remote employees who are not contributing as they should falls on the agencies. That's not insignificant. By requiring everyone to retu
by seethishat 2y ago
The cost of dealing with remote employees who are not contributing as they should falls on the agencies. That's not insignificant. By requiring everyone to return, that cost is eliminated (or at least much less). IMO, in-person, on-site that cost is much less and the problems are easier to spot early and deal with before they get worse or become more widespread (more and more workers start slacking off).
- _m_p 2y agoThe agencies pass it on to the taxpayers.
- sjsdaiuasgdia 2y ago> IMO, in-person, on-site that cost is much less and the problems are easier to spot early and deal with before they get worse Yeah that's an opinion alright. I expect it's mostly shared by managers who are unable or unwilling to really think through the question of how they can monitor their employees' productivity. If you need to visibly see someone working to measure where their productivity is versus your expectations, you're probably not a very good manager and you don't have a great handle on what your people are doing.
- scarface_74 2y agoAnd people don’t goof off in the office?